Criterios para la identificación de síndromes de cáncer de mama hereditarios. Revisión de la literatura y recomendaciones para el Instituto Nacional de Cancerología - Colombia
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.35509/01239015.866Palabras clave:
neoplasias de la mama, síndromes neoplásicos hereditarios, pruebas genéticas, predisposición genética a la enfermedad, asesoramiento genéticoResumen
Introducción. Los síndromes de cáncer de mama hereditario (SCMH) corresponden a un 5% a 10% de todos los casos de la enfermedad, en su mayoría explicados por mutaciones en los genes BRCA1 y BRCA2. Se han publicado múltiples guías y recomendaciones internacionales actualizadas, con el fin de dar lineamientos para seleccionar los casos con sospecha de un SCMH. Como antecedentes locales, el Instituto Nacional de Cancerología de Colombia cuenta con un “Programa institucional para la identificación y manejo de familias con sospecha de cáncer hereditario”, con fines asistenciales, dentro del cual el cáncer de mama es la patología más remitida al servicio de genética (55%; 540/986). En el 21% de los casos con cáncer de mama que cumplieron criterios NCCN se diagnosticó un SCMH, la mayoría asociados a mutaciones en los genes BRCA1 y BRCA2 (12,3%) y en menor proporción a otros genes de susceptibilidad al cáncer de mama (8,6%).
Objetivo. Identificar los criterios de selección más implementados para diagnosticar los casos de cáncer de mama hereditarios a través de una revisión de la literatura, y realizar un consenso Institucional sobre las indicaciones de remisión a consejería genética y solicitud de pruebas para fines diagnósticos y de tratamiento sistémico con iPARP.
Materiales y métodos. Se realizó una revisión narrativa de la literatura científica publicada en los últimos 10 años, al 30 de agosto del 2021, sobre la prevalencia de mutaciones germinales en los genes BRCA1 y BRCA2, y en otros genes no BRCA, en pacientes con cáncer de mama, obteniéndose en total 146 y seleccionándose un total de 41 artículos. En el interior de las unidades funcionales de mama y tejidos blandos, genética y oncología clínica, se presentó la evidencia disponible, realizando una discusión amplia entre las tres unidades y finalmente se definieron las indicaciones para remisión a genética, para solicitar estudios genéticos y de tratamiento sistémico con iPARP.
Resultados. Según lo reportado en la literatura, los principales criterios de sospecha de un SCMH deben incluir: el subtipo triple negativo, la presentación bilateral, la edad muy temprana de diagnóstico y los antecedentes familiares (AF) de cáncer de mama antes de los 50 años o cáncer de ovario a cualquier edad.
Conclusiones. Se adoptan las recomendaciones de la NCCN para la remisión a consejería genética y solicitud de estudios genéticos para identificar cáncer de mama hereditario, y se establecen los criterios del estudio OlympiA para la solicitud de estudios genéticos con el fin de guiar el tratamiento sistémico con iPARP en el Instituto Nacional de Cancerología. Lo anterior permitirá que desde nuestra Institución se ofrezca adecuadamente este servicio a la población colombiana.
Referencias bibliográficas
Yoshida R. Hereditary breast and ovarian cancer (HBOC): review of its molecular characteristics, screening, treatment, and prognosis. Breast Cancer. 2021;28(6):1167–80. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12282-020-01148-2
The National Comprehensive Cancer Network. Genetic/familial high-risk assessment: Breast, ovarian, and pancreatic V2.2022. 2022. Available from: https://www.nccn.org/guidelines/guidelines-detail?category=2&id=1503
Owens DK, Davidson KW, Krist AH, Barry MJ, Cabana M, Caughey AB, et al. Risk assessment, genetic counseling, and genetic testing for BRCA-related cancer: US preventive services task force recommendation statement. JAMA. 2019;322(7):652–65. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2019.10987
NICE Guidelines committee. Familial breast cancer: classification, care and managing breast cancer and related risks in people with a family history of breast cancer. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. UK. 2019. Available from: https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/cg164
Manahan ER, Kuerer HM, Sebastian M, Hughes KS, Boughey JC, Euhus DM, et al. Consensus guidelines on genetic` testing for hereditary breast cancer from the American Society of Breast Surgeons. Ann Surg Oncol. 2019;26(10):3025–31. https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-019-07549-8
Hereditary cancer syndromes and risk assessment: ACOG COMMITTEE OPINION, Number 793. Obstet Gynecol. 2019;134(6). https://doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0000000000003562
González-Santiago S, Ramón y Cajal T, Aguirre E, Alés-Martínez JE, Andrés R, Balmaña J, et al. SEOM clinical guidelines in hereditary breast and ovarian cancer (2019). Clin Transl Oncol. 2020;22:193–200. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12094-019-02262-0
Grindedal EM, Heramb C, Karsrud I, Ariansen SL, Mæhle L, Undlien DE, et al. Current guidelines for BRCA testing of breast cancer patients are insufficient to detect all mutation carriers. BMC Cancer. 2017;17:438. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-017-3422-2
Hauke J, Horvath J, Groß E, Gehrig A, Honisch E, Hackmann K, et al. Gene panel testing of 5589 BRCA1/2-negative index patients with breast cancer in a routine diagnostic setting: results of the German Consortium for Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer. Cancer Med. 2018;7(4):1349–58. https://doi.org/10.1002/cam4.1376
Schubert S, van Luttikhuizen JL, Auber B, Schmidt G, Hofmann W, Penkert J, et al. The identification of pathogenic variants in BRCA1 y BRCA2 negative, high risk, hereditary breast and/or ovarian cancer patients: High frequency of FANCM pathogenic variants. Int J Cancer. 2019;144(11):2683–94. https://doi.org/10.1002/ijc.31992
Kwong A, Shin VY, Chen J, Cheuk IWY, Ho CYS, Au CH, et al. Germline mutation in 1338 BRCA-negative chinese hereditary breast and/or ovarian cancer patients: Clinical testing with a multigene test panel. J Mol Diagnostics. 2020;22(4):544–54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmoldx.2020.01.013
Bonache S, Esteban I, Moles-Fernández A, Tenés A, Duran-Lozano L, Montalban G, et al. Multigene panel testing beyond BRCA1 y BRCA2 in breast/ovarian cancer Spanish families and clinical actionability of findings. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2018;144(12):2495–513. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00432-018-2763-9
Yang S, Axilbund JE, O’Leary E, Michalski ST, Evans R, Lincoln SE, et al. Underdiagnosis of hereditary breast and ovarian cancer in medicare patients: Genetic Testing criteria miss the mark. Ann Surg Oncol. 2018;25(10):2925–31. https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-018-6621-4
Ndugga-Kabuye MK, Issaka RB. Inequities in multi-gene hereditary cancer testing: lower diagnostic yield and higher VUS rate in individuals who identify as Hispanic, African or Asian and Pacific Islander as compared to European. Fam Cancer. 2019;18(4):465–9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10689-019-00144-6
Li J, Meeks H, Feng BJ, Healey S, Thorne H, Makunin I, et al. Targeted massively parallel sequencing of a panel of putative breast cancer susceptibility genes in a large cohort of multiple-case breast and ovarian cancer families. J Med Genet. 2016;53(1):34–42. https://doi.org/10.1136/jmedgenet-2015-103452
Lerner-Ellis J, Sopik V, Wong A, Lázaro C, Narod S , Charames G. Retesting of women who are negative for a BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation using a 20-gene panel. J Med Genet. 2020;57(6):380–4. https://doi.org/10.1136/jmedgenet-2019-106403
Buys SS, Sandbach JF, Gammon A, Patel G, Kidd J, Brown KL, et al. A study of over 35,000 women with breast cancer tested with a 25-gene panel of hereditary cancer genes. Cancer. 2017;8(123):1721–30. https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.30498
Grzymski JJ, Elhanan G, Morales Rosado JA, Smith E, Schlauch KA, Read R, et al. Population genetic screening efficiently identifies carriers of autosomal dominant diseases. Nat Med. 2020;26(8):1235–9. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41591-020-0982-5
Schmidt MK, Van Den Broek AJ, Tollenaar RAEM, Smit VTHBM, Westenend PJ, Brinkhuis M, et al. Breast cancer survival of BRCA1/BRCA2 mutation carriers in a hospital-based cohort of young women. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2017;109(8):djw329. https://doi.org/10.1093/jnci/djw329
Momozawa Y, Iwasaki Y, Parsons MT, Kamatani Y, Takahashi A, Tamura C, et al. Germline pathogenic variants of 11 breast cancer genes in 7,051 Japanese patients and 11,241 controls. Nat Commun. 2018;9(1):4083. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-018-06581-8
Dos Santos Vidal R, Hawrysh A, Walia JS, Davey S, Feilotter H. Eligibility criteria and genetic testing results from a highrisk cohort for hereditary breast and ovarian cancer syndrome in Southeastern Ontario. J Mol Diagnostics. 2016;18(3):362–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmoldx.2015.11.007
Eliade M, Skrzypski J, Baurand A, Jacquot C, Bertolone G, Loustalot C, et al. The transfer of multigene panel testing for hereditary breast and ovarian cancer to healthcare: What are the implications for the management of patients and families? Oncotarget. 2017;8(2):1957–71. https://doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.12699
Altinoz A, Al Ameri M, Qureshi W, Boush N, Nair SC, Abdel-Aziz A. Clinicopathological characteristics of gene-positive breast cancer in the United Arab Emirates. Breast. 2020;53:119–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.breast.2020.07.005
Rofes P, Valle J Del, Torres-Esquius S, Feliubadaló L, Stradella A, Moreno-Cabrera JM, et al. Bard1 pathogenic variants are associated with triple-negative breast cancer in a spanish hereditary breast and ovarian cancer cohort. Genes (Basel). 2021;12(2):150. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes12020150
Castéra L, Harter V, Muller E, Krieger S, Goardon N, Ricou A, et al. Landscape of pathogenic variations in a panel of 34 genes and cancer risk estimation from 5131 HBOC families. Genet Med. 2018;20(12):1677–86. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41436-018-0005-9
Yablonski-Peretz T, Paluch-Shimon S, Gutman LS, Kaplan Y, Dvir A, Barnes-Kedar I, et al. Screening for germline mutations in breast/ovarian cancer susceptibility genes in high-risk families in Israel. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2016;155(1):133–8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-015-3662-2
Wong-Brown MW, Meldrum CJ, Carpenter JE, Clarke CL, Narod SA, Jakubowska A, et al. Prevalence of BRCA1 and BRCA2 germline mutations in patients with triple-negative breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2015;150(1):71–80. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-015-3293-7
Chávarri-Guerra Y, Marcum CA, Hendricks CB, Wilbur D, Cescón T, Merluza C, et al. Breast cancer associated pathogenic variants among women 61 years and older with triple negative breast cancer. J Geriatr Oncol. 2021;12(5):749–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jgo.2020.11.008
Shao D, Cheng S, Guo F, Zhu C, Yuan Y, Hu K, et al. Prevalence of hereditary breast and ovarian cancer (HBOC) predisposition gene mutations among 882 HBOC highrisk Chinese individuals. Cancer Sci. 2020;111(2):647–57. https://doi.org/10.1111/cas.14242
Alemar B, Gregório C, Herzog J, Bittar CM, Brinckmann Oliveira Netto C, Artigalas O, et al. BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutational profile and prevalence in hereditary breast and ovarian cancer (HBOC) probands from Southern Brazil: Are international testing criteria appropriate for this specific population? PLoS One. 2017;12(11):E0187630. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0187630
Cock-Rada AM, Ossa CA, Garcia HI, Gomez LR. A multigene panel study in hereditary breast and ovarian cancer in Colombia. Fam Cancer. 2018;17(1):23–30. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10689-017-0004-z
Oliver J, Quezada Urban R, Franco Cortés CA, Díaz Velásquez CE, Montealegre Paez AL, Pacheco-Orozco RA, et al. Latin American study of hereditary breast and ovarian cancer LACAM: A genomic epidemiology approach. Front Oncol. 2019;(9):1429. https://doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2019.01429
Engel C, Rhiem K, Hahnen E, Loibl S, Weber KE, Seiler S, et al. Prevalence of pathogenic BRCA1/2 germline mutations among 802 women with unilateral triple negative breast cancer without family cancer history. BMC Cancer. 2018;18(1):265. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-018-4029-y
Okano M, Nomizu T, Tachibana K, Nagatsuka M, Matsuzaki M, Katagata N, et al. The relationship between BRCA-associated breast cancer and age factors: an analysis of the Japanese HBOC consortium database. J Hum Genet. 2021;66(3):307–14. https://doi.org/10.1038/s10038-020-00849-y
Frey MK, Kopparam R V., Ni Zhou Z, Fields JC, Buskwofie A, Carlson AD, et al. Prevalence of nonfounder BRCA1/2 mutations in Ashkenazi Jewish patients presenting for genetic testing at a hereditary breast and ovarian cancer center. Cancer. 2019;125(5):690–7. https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.31856
Bednar EM, Oakley HD, Sun CC, Burke CC, Munsell MF, Westin SN, et al. A universal genetic testing initiative for patients with high-grade, non-mucinous epithelial ovarian cancer and the implications for cancer treatment. Gynecol Oncol. 2017;146(2):399–404. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ygyno.2017.05.037
Sharma P, Klemp JR, Kimler BF, Mahnken JD, Geier LJ, Khan QJ, et al. Germline BRCA mutation evaluation in a prospective triple-negative breast cancer registry: Implications for hereditary breast and/or ovarian cancer syndrome testing. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2014;145(3):707–14. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-014-2980-0
Foglietta J, Ludovini V, Bianconi F, Pistola L, Reda MS, Al-Refaie A, et al. Prevalence and spectrum of brca germline variants in central Italian high risk or familial breast/ovarian cancer patients: A monocentric study. Genes (Basel). 2020;11(8):925. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes11080925
Sánchez-Bermúdez AI, Sarabia-Meseguer MD, García-Aliaga Á, Marín-Vera M, Macías-Cerrolaza JA, Henaréjos PS, et al. Mutational analysis of RAD51C and RAD51D genes in hereditary breast and ovarian cancer families from Murcia (southeastern Spain). Eur J Med Genet. 2018;61(6):355–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejmg.2018.01.015
Lynce F, Smith KL, Stein J, DeMarco T, Wang Y, Wang H, et al. Deleterious BRCA1/2 mutations in an urban population of Black women. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2015;153(1):201–9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-015-3527-8
Fostira F, Tsitlaidou M, Papadimitriou C, Pertesi M, Timotheadou E, Stavropoulou A V., et al. Prevalence of BRCA1 mutations among 403 women with triple-negative breast cancer: Implications for genetic screening selection criteria: A Hellenic Cooperative Oncology Group Study. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2012;134(1):353–62. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-012-2021-9
Arai M, Yokoyama S, Watanabe C, Yoshida R, Kita M, Okawa M, et al. Genetic and clinical characteristics in Japanese hereditary breast and ovarian cancer: First report after establishment of HBOC registration system in Japan. J Hum Genet. 2018;63(4):447–57. https://doi.org/10.1038/s10038-017-0355-1
Tedaldi G, Tebaldi M, Zampiga V, Danesi R, Arcangeli V, Ravegnani M, et al. Multiple-gene panel analysis in a case series of 255 women with hereditary breast and ovarian cancer. Oncotarget. 2017;18(8):47064–75. https://doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.16791
Coppa A, Nicolussi A, D’Inzeo S, Capalbo C, Belardinilli F, Colicchia V, et al. Optimizing the identification of risk-relevant mutations by multigene panel testing in selected hereditary breast/ovarian cancer families. Cancer Med. 2018;7(1):46–55. https://doi.org/10.1002/cam4.1251
Peixoto A, Santos C, Pinto P, Pinheiro M, Rocha P, Pinto C, et al. The role of targeted BRCA1/BRCA2 mutation analysis in hereditary breast/ovarian cancer families of Portuguese ancestry. Clin Genet. 2015;88(1):41–8. https://doi.org/10.1111/cge.12441
Azzollini J, Scuvera G, Bruno E, Pasanisi P, Zaffaroni D, Calvello M, et al. Mutation detection rates associated with specific selection criteria for BRCA1/2 testing in 1854 high-risk families: A monocentric Italian study. Eur J Intern Med. 2016;32:65–71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejim.2016.03.010
Greenup R, Buchanan A, Lorizio W, Rhoads K, Chan S, Leedom T, et al. Prevalence of BRCA mutations among women with triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) in a genetic counseling cohort. Ann Surg Oncol. 2013;20(10):3254–8. https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-013-3205-1
Kast K, Rhiem K, Wappenschmidt B, Hahnen E, Hauke J, Bluemcke B, et al. Prevalence of BRCA1/2 germline mutations in 21 401 families with breast and ovarian cancer. J Med Genet. 2016;53(7):465–71. https://doi.org/10.1136/jmedgenet-2015-103672
Kurian AW, Antoniou AC, Domchek SM. Refining breast cancer risk stratification: Additional genes, additional information. Am Soc Clin Oncol Educ B. 2016;35:44–56. https://doi.org/10.1200/EDBK_158817
Beitsch PD, Whitworth PW, Hughes K, Patel R, Rosen B, Compagnoni G, et al. Underdiagnosis of hereditary breast cancer: Are genetic testing guidelines a tool or an obstacle? J Clin Oncol. 2019;37(6):453–60. https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.18.01631
Heemskerk-Gerritsen BAM, Rookus MA, Aalfs CM, Ausems MGEM, Collée JM, Jansen L, et al. Improved overall survival after contralateral risk-reducing mastectomy in BRCA1/2 mutation carriers with a history of unilateral breast cancer: A prospective analysis. Int J Cancer. 2015;136(3):668–77. https://doi.org/10.1002/ijc.29032
Robson M, Im S-A, Senkus E, Xu B, Domchek SM, Masuda N, et al. Olaparib for metastatic breast cancer in patients with a germline BRCA Mutation. N Engl J Med. 2017;377(6):523–33. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1706450
Lincoln SE, Nussbaum RL, Kurian AW, Nielsen SM, Das K, Michalski S, et al. Yield and utility of Germline Testing following tumor sequencing in patients with cancer. JAMA Netw Open. 2020;3(10):e2019452. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.19452
Tutt ANJ, Garber JE, Kaufman B, Viale G, Fumagalli D, Rastogi P, et al. Adjuvant Olaparib for patients with BRCA1 - or BRCA2 -mutated breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 2021;384:2394–405. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa2105215
Cómo citar
Descargas
Descargas
Publicado
Número
Sección
Licencia
Derechos de autor 2023 Revista Colombiana de Cancerología
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 4.0.
Todos los derechos reservados.
