Alternative and Complimentary Approaches for Health Care in Children with Cancer: Focus Group Study
Keywords:
Complementary Therapies, Neoplasms, Focus Groups, MinorsAbstract
Objectives: This study seeks to identify what kinds of complimentary approaches and health care alternatives are used by parents or caregivers of children with cancer treated at the National Cancer Institute in Bogotá, as well as the mechanisms of action which allow them to be achieved.
Methods: The study was based on qualitative methodology with focus groups in which types of intervention and proposed mechanisms of action were explored.
Results: Five focus groups were formed, with a total of 45 participants (parents or caregivers of children with cancer). The most widely discussed intervention topics were those related to biological therapy; with immune system reinforcement appearing as the primary mechanism of action.
Conclusions: A distinction appears to exist in the use of health care approaches —some of which are not reported on in the literature —between children and adults. Diverse mechanisms of action for biological therapy have been suggested, mostly in reports from studies carried out in other cultures. It is necessary that the frequency with which these interventions are used be quantified among the pediatric population.
Author Biographies
Ricardo Sánchez, Instituto Nacional de Cancerología
Grupo de Investigación Clínica, Instituto Nacional de Cancerología, Bogotá D.C., Colombia
Universidad Nacional, Bogotá D.C., Colombia
Mónica Ballesteros, Instituto Nacional de Cancerología
Grupo de Investigación Clínica, Instituto Nacional de Cancerología, Bogotá D.C., Colombia
Amaranto Suárez, Instituto Nacional de Cancerología
Clínica de Oncología Pediátrica, Instituto Nacional de Cancerología, Bogotá D.C., Colombia
Elizabeth Cortés, Instituto Nacional de Cancerología
Clínica de Oncología Pediátrica, Instituto Nacional de Cancerología, Bogotá D.C., Colombia
References
National Center for Complementary and Alternative Medicine. What is complementary and alternative medicine? [internet]. 14 octubre 2009 [citado: 25 de febrero del 2010]. Disponible en: http://nccam.nih.gov/health/whatiscam/.
Eisenberg DM, Kessler RC, Foster C, et al. Unconventional medicine in the United States. Prevalence, costs, and patterns of use. N Engl J Med. 1993;328:246-52.
https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJM199301283280406
NIH National center for complementary and alternative medicine. Classification of complementary and alternative medical practices. NCCAM publication No D 156 [inter net]. 2002 [citado: 25 de febrero del 2010]. Disponible en: http://nccam.nih.gov/health/whatiscam.
Organización Mundial de la Salud. Estrategia de OMS sobre medicina tradicional 2002-2005. Ginebra: OMS; 2001.
Kara KM. Complementary and alternative medical therapies for children with cancer. Eur J Cancer. 2004;40:2041-6.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejca.2004.05.012
Gómez R, Tlacuilo A, Garibaldi R. Use of complementary and alternative medicine in children with cancer in occidental, Mexico. Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2007;49:820-3.
https://doi.org/10.1002/pbc.21101
Friedman T, Slayton WB, Allen LS, et al. Use of alternative therapies for children with cancer. Pediatrics. 1997;100:1-6.
https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.100.6.e1
Cincotta DR, Crawford NW, Lim A, et al. Comparison of complementary and alternative medicine use: reasons and motivations between two tertiary children's hospitals. Arch Dis Child. 2006;91:153-8.
https://doi.org/10.1136/adc.2005.074872
Melnick SJ. Developmental therapeutic: Review of biologically basic CAM therapies for potential application in children with cancer. Part I. J Pediatr Hematol Oncol. 2006;28:221-30.
https://doi.org/10.1097/01.mph.0000212922.16427.04
Melnick SJ. Developmental Therapeutic: review of biologically based complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) therapies for potential application in children with cancer. Part II. J Pediatr Hematol Oncol. 2006;28:271-85.
https://doi.org/10.1097/01.mph.0000212900.76523.16
Ernest E, Cassileth BR. The prevalence of complementary alternative medicine in cancer: a sitematic review. Cancer. 1998; 83:777-82.
https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0142(19980815)83:4<777::AID-CNCR22>3.0.CO;2-O
Lim J, Wong M, Chan MY, et al. Use of complementary and alternative medicine in paediatric oncology patients in Singapore. Ann Acad Med Singapore. 2006;35:753-8.
Lindlof TR, Taylor BC. Qualitative communication research methods, 2nd ed. California: Sage; 2002.
Bowling A. Research methods in health: investigaring health and health services. 3rd ed. Berkshire: Open University Press; 2009.
Sim J. Collecting and analysing qualitative data: issues raised by the focus group. J Adv Nurs. 1998;28:345-52.
https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2648.1998.00692.x
Kruger R, Casey M. Focus groups: a practical guide for applied research, 4th ed. Los Angeles: Sage; 2009.
Holloway I, Wheeler S. Qualitative research for nurses. Oxford: Blackwell Science; 1996.
Myers C, Stuber ML, Bonamer-Rheingans JI, et al. Complementary therapies and childhood cancer. Cancer Control. 2005;12:172-80.
https://doi.org/10.1177/107327480501200305
Sánchez R, Venegas MA. Aproximaciones complementarias y alternativas al cuidado de la salud en el Instituto Nacional de Cancerología: estudio de prevalencia. Rev Colomb Cancerol. 2010;14:135-43.
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0123-9015(10)70094-9
Vanegas BC, Chaves MP, Beltrán G, et al. Creencias populares acerca de la curación del cáncer de próstata y cérvico uterino y experiencias de aplicación en pacientes de una institución de salud, Bogotá. Revista Colombiana de Enfermería 2008;3:69-76.
https://doi.org/10.18270/rce.v3i3.1404
Fernández CV, Stutzer CA, MacWilliam L, et al. Alternative and complementary therapy use in pediatric oncology patients in British Columbia: prevalence and reasons for use and nonuse. J Clin Oncol. 1998;16:1279-86.
https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.1998.16.4.1279
Freud S. Totem and taboo : some points of agreement between the mental lives of savages and neurotics. London: Routledge; 1999.
Ulbricht C, Armstrong J, Basch E, et al. An evidence-based systematic review of Aloe vera by the natural standard research collaboration. J Herb Pharmacother. 2007;7:279-323.
https://doi.org/10.1080/15228940802153339
Ukiya M, Akihisa T, Yasukawa K, et al. Anti-inflammatory, anti-tumor-promoting, and cytotoxic activities of constituents of marigold (Calendula officinalis) flowers. J Nat Prod. 2006;69:1692-6.
https://doi.org/10.1021/np068016b
D'Andrea GM. Use of antioxidants during chemotherapy and radiotherapy should be avoided. CA Cancer J Clin. 2005;55:319-21.
https://doi.org/10.3322/canjclin.55.5.319
Richardson J, Smith JE, Mccall G, et al. Hypnosis for nausea and vomiting in cancer chemotherapy: a systematic review of the research evidence. Eur J Cancer Care (Engl). 2007;16:402-12.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2354.2006.00736.x
Mathijssen RH, Verweij J, de Bruin P, et al. Effects of St. John's wort on irinotecan metabolism. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2002;94:1247-9.
https://doi.org/10.1093/jnci/94.16.1247
Amato P, Christophe S, Mellon PL. Estrogenic activity of herbs commonly used as remedies for menopausal symptoms. Menopause. 2002;9:145-50.
https://doi.org/10.1097/00042192-200203000-00010
Weiger WA, Smith M, Boon H, et al. Advising patients who seek complementary and alternative medical therapies for cancer. Ann Intern Med. 2002;137:889-903.
https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-137-11-200212030-00010
Labriola D, Livingston R. Possible interactions between dietary antioxidants and chemotherapy. Oncology. 1999;13:1003-8.
How to Cite
Downloads
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Todos los derechos reservados.
