PET-CT en pacientes con cáncer de pulmón
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0123-9015(13)70037-4Biografía del autor/a
Augusto Llamas, Instituto Nacional de Cancerología
Grupo de Medicina Nuclear, Instituto Nacional de Cancerología, Bogotá D.C., Colombia
Rafael Beltrán, Instituto Nacional de Cancerología
Clínica de Tórax, Instituto Nacional de Cancerología, Bogotá D.C., Colombia
Plutarco García, nstituto Nacional de Cancerología
Clínica de Tórax, Instituto Nacional de Cancerología, Bogotá D.C., Colombia
Jesús Alejandro Estévez, Instituto Nacional de Cancerología
Grupo de Medicina Nuclear, Instituto Nacional de Cancerología, Bogotá D.C., Colombia
Giancarlo Buitrago, Instituto Nacional de Cancerología
Grupo de Investigación Clínica. Instituto Nacional de Cancerología, Bogotá D.C., Colombia
Referencias bibliográficas
Parkin DM, Bray F, Ferlay J, Pisani P. Global cancer statistics, 2002. CA Cancer J Clin. 2005;55(2):74-108.
https://doi.org/10.3322/canjclin.55.2.74
Ferlay J, Shin HR, Bray F, Forman D, Mathers C, Parkin DM. GLOBOCAN 2006 database: fast stats [Internet]. Lyon, France: International Agency for Research on Cancer 2010 [Citado: 10 julio 2010]. Disponible en: http://globocan.iarc,fr/factsheets/populations/factsheet.asp,2006.
Jemal A, Siegel R, Ward E, Hao Y, Xu J, Murray T, et al. Cancer statistics, 2008. CA Cancer J Clin. 2008;58(2):71-96.
https://doi.org/10.3322/CA.2007.0010
Brown ML, Riley GF, Schussler N, Etzioni R. Estimating health care costs related to cancer treatment from SEER- Medicare data. Med Care. 2002;40(8 Suppl):IV-104-17.
https://doi.org/10.1097/00005650-200208001-00014
Colombia, Departamento Administrativo Nacional de Estadística. Estadísticas Vitales-Defunciones no fetales. [Internet] Bogotá: DANE; 2006 [Citado: 20 enero 2010]. Disponible en: http://www.dane.gov.co/les/investigaciones/poblacion/defunciones/defun_2007/CUADRO5.xls.
Piñeros M, Murillo R. Incidencia de cáncer en Colombia: importancia de las fuentes de información en la obtención de cifras estimativas. Rev Colomb Cancerol. 2004;8(1):5-14.
Poland, Agency for Health Technology Assessment in Poland. Cost-effectiveness analysis of PET-CT positron emission tomography and the diagnostic technologies financed from public sources in oncological diagnostic in Poland. Clinical and epidemiological aspects. Warszawa-Nowy Sacz, Agency for Health Technology Assessment in Poland; 2006.
Alberg AJ, Ford JG, Samet JM; American College of Chest Physicians. Epidemiology of Lung Cancer: ACCP eviden-ce-based clinical practice guidelines (2nd dition). Chest. 2007;132(3 Suppl):29S-55S. Review.
https://doi.org/10.1378/chest.07-1347
Colombia, Instituto Nacional de Cancerología. Registro Institucional de Cáncer. En: Anuario Estadístico 2007. Bogotá: INC; 2008. p. 10-55.
Colombia, Instituto Nacional de Cancerología. Registro Institucional de Cáncer. En: Anuario Estadístico 2008. Bogotá: INC; 2009. p. 10-55.
España, Ministerio de Sanidad y Consumo, Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Agencia de Evaluación de Tecnologías Sanitarias. PET-TAC: Indicaciones, revisión sistemática y meta-análisis. Madrid: Agencia de Evaluación de Tecnologías Sanitarias; 2004.
Facey K, Bradbury I, Laking G, Payne E. Overview of the clinical effectiveness of positron emission tomography imaging in selected cancers. Health Technol Assess. 2007;11(44):iii.iv, xi-267.
https://doi.org/10.3310/hta11440
Senan S, De Ruysscher D. Critical review of PET-CT for radiotherapy planning in lung cancer. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol. 2005;56(3):345-51.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.critrevonc.2005.05.001
Freudenberg LS, Rosenbaum SJ, Beyer T, Bockisch A, Antoch G. PET versus PET/CT dual-modality imaging in evaluation of lung cancer. Thorac Surg Clin. 2010;20(1):25-30.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.thorsurg.2009.12.003
Truong MT, Munden RF, Movsas B. Imaging to optimally stage lung cancer: conventional modalities and PET/CT. J Am Coll Radiol. 2004;1(12):957-64.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacr.2004.07.007
Czernin J, Allen-Auerbach M, Schelbert HR. Improvements in cancer staging with PET/CT: literature-based evidence as of September 2006. J Nucl Med. 2007;48 Suppl l:78S-88S.
Sachelarie I, Kerr K, Ghesani M, Blum RH. Integrated PET-CT: evidence-based review of oncology indications. Oncology. 2005;19(4):481-90.
Podoloff DA, Advani RH, Allred C, Benson AB 3rd, Brown E, Burstein HJ, et al. NCCN task force report: positron emission tomography (PET)/computed tomography (CT) scanning in cancer. J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2007;5Suppl 1:S1-S22.
Antoch G, Stattaus J, Nemat AT, Marnitz S, Beyer T, Kuehl H, et al. Non-small cell lung cancer: dual-modality PET/CT in preoperative staging. Radiology. 2003;229(2):526-33.
https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2292021598
Lardinois D, Weder W, Hany TF, Kamel EM, Korom S, Seifert B, et al. Staging of non-small-cell lung cancer with integrated positron-emission tomography and computed tomography. N Engl J Med. 2003;348(25):2500-7.
https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa022136
Shim SS, Lee KS, Kim BT, Chung MJ, Lee EJ, Han J, et al. Non-small cell lung cancer: prospective comparison of integrated FDG PET/CT and CT alone for preoperative staging. Radiology. 2005;236(3):1011-9.
https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2363041310
Cerfolio RJ, Bryant AS, Ojha B, Eloubeidi M. Improving the inaccuracies of clinical staging of patients with NSCLC: a prospective trial. Ann Thorac Surg. 2005;80(4):1207-14.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.athoracsur.2005.04.019
Cerfolio RJ, Ojha B, Bryant AS, Raghuveer V, Mountz JM, Bartolucci AA. The accuracy of integrated PET-CT compared with dedicated PET alone for the staging of patients with nonsmall cell lung cancer. Ann Thorac Surg. 2004;78(3):1017-23.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.athoracsur.2004.02.067
Keidar Z, Haim N, Guralnik L, Wollner M, Bar-Shalom R, Ben-Nun A, et al. PET/CT using 18F-FDG in suspected lung cancer recurrence: diagnostic value and impact on patient management. J Nucl Med. 2004;45(10):1640-6.
Gould MK, Maclean CC, Kuschner WG, Rydzak CE, Owens DK. Accuracy of positron emission tomography for diagnosis of pulmonary nodules and mass lesions: a meta-analysis. JAMA. 2001; 285(7):914-24.
https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.285.7.914
National Collamorating Centre for Acuete Care, The Diagnosis and Treatment of Lung Cancer. Methods, evidence and guidance. 2005. [Internet]. London: The Royal College of Surgeons of England [Citado: 20 enero 2010]. Disponible en: http://www.nice.org.uk/nicemedia/pdf/cg024fullguideline.pdf
Vansteenkiste JF, Stroobants SG, Dupont PJ, De Leyn PR, De Wever WF, Verbeken EK, et al. FDG-PET scan in potentially operable non-small cell lung cancer: do anatometabolic PET-CT fusion images improve the localisation of regional lymph node metastases? Eur J Nucl Med. 1998;25(11):1495-501.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s002590050327
Antoch G, Vogt FM, Freudenberg LS, Nazaradeh F, Goehde SC, Barkhausen J, et al. Whole-body dual-modality PET/CT and whole-body MRI for tumor staging in oncology. JAMA. 2003;290(24):3199-206.
https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.290.24.3199
Bristow RE, del Carmen MG, Pannu HK, Cohade C, Zahurak ML, Fishman EK, et al. Clinically occult recurrent ovarian cancer: patient selection for secondary cytoreductive surgery using combined PET/CT. Gynecol Oncol. 2003;90(3):519-28.
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0090-8258(03)00336-6
Hany TF, Steinert HC, Goerres GW, Buck A, von Schulthess GK. PET diagnostic accuracy: improvement with in-line PET-CT system: initial results. Radiology. 2002;225(2):575-81.
https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2252011568
Cleemput I, Dargent G, Poelmans J, Camberlin C, Van den Bruel A, Ramaekers D. HTA positron emission tomography in Belgium. KCE Reports Vol. 22C. Brussels: Centre Federal d'Expertise des Soins de Santé; 2005.
Cómo citar
Descargas
Descargas
Publicado
Número
Sección
Licencia

Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 4.0.
Todos los derechos reservados.
| Estadísticas de artículo | |
|---|---|
| Vistas de resúmenes | |
| Vistas de PDF | |
| Descargas de PDF | |
| Vistas de HTML | |
| Otras vistas | |

